Built to Suit the Retail Real Estate Industry PlainVanillaShell US Edition You are signed in as  
guest  

Sign in now  

Logout  
topnav
Home News Archive Featured Stories Retail Real Estate Marketplace Contact Us Subscription Info
legal  

legal

Print Page A Horse of a Different Color
by Ron Davis

A major tenant of a South Carolina shopping center will simply have to accept the fact that the center's anchor tenant has undergone a big change.

The shopping center, located in Greenville, is White Horse Plaza, which has leased space to the major tenant, a Winn-Dixie supermarket, since 1987. And the change occurred when the anchor tenant, a Wal-Mart discount store, moved its retail operations elsewhere and converted the store at White Horse Plaza to a service center/warehouse.

After conversion of the Wal-Mart store, Winn-Dixie noted a drop in the number of patrons of the shopping center, and, as a result, Winn-Dixie sued the shopping center's owners, claiming that they breached the lease by allowing the conversion.

But Winn-Dixie had originally drafted that lease, and its wording doesn't include any continuous occupancy provisions as to the operation of a retail Wal-Mart store at the shopping center. And since Wal-Mart had not relinquished any of its space, but merely changed its method of operation, the shopping center's owners argued that no breach of lease had occurred.

Winn-Dixie charged, however, that it had been induced to enter into its lease by the promise of the shopping center's owners that they had leased space to Wal-Mart for 20 years as "an anchor tenant."

The case was tried in Georgia, and a Georgia court ruled that the shopping center's owners had not breached its lease agreement with Winn-Dixie. Winn-Dixie appealed.

A Georgia appellate court upheld the lower court decision, explaining, "Winn-Dixie states that it entered into the shopping center lease through representations that Wal-Mart would be a tenant for 20 years in a noncancellable lease with 81,922 square feet of rental space. The evidence shows that this was and is the case. The lease does not state that Wal-Mart must operate the premises as a retail store for the entire 20-year period, and so long as Wal-Mart occupies the space in some capacity within the provisions of the lease, the terms were satisfied. Even though Wal-Mart closed its retail store there and moved it, it remains a tenant in good standing under the lease." (Winn-Dixie Charlotte vs. Brunner Cos. Income, 538 S.E.2d 152 [Ga.App. 2000])

Decision: September 2000 Published: February 2001

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Contact | About Us