Built to Suit the Retail Real Estate Industry PlainVanillaShell US Edition You are signed in as  
guest  

Sign in now  

Logout  
topnav
Home News Archive Featured Stories Retail Real Estate Marketplace Contact Us Subscription Info
legal  

legal

Print Page Not a Whiff of Fraud
by Ron Davis

Experience and professional help have, oddly enough, hampered reprisal efforts by the tenants of a Texas shopping center in a lease dispute with the centerís owner.

The shopping center is Keystone Park, located in the Dallas area, and the tenants (a husband and wife) operated a restaurant there for only a brief time. The primary reason for the restaurantís closing was a sewer-related gas-odor problem that seemingly had no solution at the time. The odor apparently resulted in a decline in patronage for the restaurantóand its ultimate failure.

The restaurantís tenants subsequently sued the shopping center owner, asserting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, constructive eviction, and breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, among other charges. The centerís owner responded with a lawsuit to collect unpaid rent and other damages.

Under Texas law, proof of fraud requires evidence that a portrayal was false and that the portrayal was known to be false when made. There also must be a distortion of facts that was intended to be acted on and that caused financial injury.

A charge of negligent misrepresentation requires proof that a person with a financial interest supplied information that is false and that results in a financial loss by someone relying on that source of information.

The shopping center owner pointed out, however, that the tenantsí broker and attorney assisted in the lease negotiations and the finalizing of the lease terms. Moreover, at least seven different drafts of the lease were circulated among the tenant principals, their brokers, and their attorneys during the negotiation period. Finally, during the lease negotiations (which occurred over the course of five months) the tenants, experienced restaurateurs, personally visited the restaurant premises on several occasions, yet willingly signed the lease.

At trial, a Texas court decided in favor of the tenants and ruled that the centerís owner must pay $1,286,084 in damages. The centerís owner appealed.

A Texas appellate court reversed the lower court, noting a provision of the lease that stated, ďTenant acknowledges that neither landlord nor landlordís agents, employees, nor contractors have made any representations or promises with respect to the site, the shopping center, or this lease except as expressly set forth herein.Ē

Added the judges, ďThe parties to this armís length transaction were sophisticated in dealings involving the leasing and the operation of restaurant properties, several drafts of the lease were circulated, and various changes were negotiated and made to both the lease and a guarantyÖ. ď[They] clearly and unequivocally expressed their intent that they were not relying on any representations made outside of this agreement.Ē (Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd., 2008 WL 2841848 [Tex.App.-Eastland])

Decision: July 2008
Published: August 2008

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Contact | About Us